LOGISTICS: Assignment 1 is nominally due today, but almost no one has turned it in yet. Since there are no solutions (or ``right answers'') to this first assignment, I can accept them any time right up to the last day of classes (there must be some limit!) - but of course it is not in your interest to let assigments pile up....
What do people think about having a take-home final exam? Several options are possible; if you can reach a consensus on the P455 WebCT Bulletin Board (which see!) in time for me to make plans, I will try to implement your choice.
HANDOUTS: Assignment 2 - due next Wed.
READING: You should be finished with Ch. 1 and Ch. 2 and starting on Ch. 3 now.
in the limit of high temperature (it can never actually get
larger than 100% spin polarization, of course).
This corresponds to a net spin energy of
U = Nm2B2/
so
U2 = N2m4B4
/
2.
If we plug this back into
=
o -
U2/2m2B2N
and pretend that the thermal equilibrium value of U
is actually the value of U, we get
=
o -
N m2 B2
/ 2
2 .
.
Therefore if
stays constant
while B is reduced by some factor, then
gets reduced by the same factor.
In such a process the temperature of the spin system
is abruptly decreased by the same factor as the magnetic field.
(the spins cannot be more than 100% polarized)
the limit on the starting temperature
initial
depends upon the magnetic moment m and the field B.
For paramagnetic moments m
µB =
9.274
10-21
erg/G, while kB =
1.381
10-16
erg/K, so Tinitial[K]
Binitial[G]/104. That is, for a
10,000 G [1 T] initial field one can cool from no lower than
about 1 K.
To start from even lower
initial
one can use adiabatic nuclear demagnetization, for which typical
magnetic moments are several thousand times weaker. Then one may
start from 1 mK at 3 T and cool into the microKelvin (µK) range.
The coldest temperatures ever achieved in laboratories on Earth
use huge refrigerators several stories high (with elaborate vibration-free
mountings) with a final stage based on adiabatic nuclear demagnetization.
> of energy

.
The total energy of the two combined systems is U and so the energy
of the reservoir is UR =
U - 
.
The probability P
of such a configuration is proportional to the
product of the multiplicities for the two systems:
gR for the reservoir and 1 for the
fully specified state. Thus
P
gR(U-
)
= exp(
R(U) -
[
R
/
UR]

)
exp(-
/
) .
(Recall the definition of
)
This is called the Boltzmann factor.
of finding
the small system in that particular microscopic quantum state.
To do so, we much divide by the sum of all such factors:
P
=
exp(-
/
)/Z,
where
Z

exp(-
/
)
< U >


exp(-
/
)
< U > =
2
(log Z)/
.

to the small system, a device can cause higher energy states of a system
to be more likely than lower energy states even though the system
is nominally in thermal equilibrium with a large reservoir.
var U
< (U - < U > )2 > =
2
U/
.